Some of the questions which arose as I pored through the article were:
a) Does Individual responsibility have to be publicized? How much of charity is publicized. Statistics from a particular case in point can be misleading e.g. just taking Boston’s Institute of contemporary art(ICA) as a single data point prove that less than 1% of private gifts to charity are anonymous might be erroneous.
b) Is charity increasing in terms of volume figures and actual revenue? A 2001 survey that 89% of Americans gave to charity does point towards charity becoming more broad-based. Actual charity revenue might be totally opposite. Taking inflation into account, the tripling of charity to $306 Billion from a base of $100 Billion in 1965 is no wonder. In real Dollar terms, charity today should be approximately $719.47 Billion to have the same effect it had in 1965. Take a look at the table below. The table below also illustrates the effects of compounding. If there is 7% inflation, then money doubles in 10 years. Coming back to the crux of the article, if the author of the article intended to point out that charity has increased due to associated social incentives; it is not the case at least in real dollar terms. The data points to charity in real dollar terms being half of what it was in the year 1965.
c) Are financial incentives in charity inversely correlated to looking good in the eyes of those whose opinion charity givers really care about (Image motivation)? According to the article behavioral economics might provide the answer, but going by the recent boom bust and catastrophe in the global economy, it seems highly unlikely. In case of blood donation, the hypothesis might be true, but it cannot be expanded to cover all charity and all financial incentives to charity. Tax breaks are a very strong incentive to charity.
In some parts of the world, Charity is a method to launder money from black to white. Educational institutions and religious institutions play a role in this business.
Right wing Economists who have a belief that self interest governs most actions of man are intrigued by charity. They will take solace in the fact that charity has in fact fallen to half of what it was five decades back in real dollar terms. They might miss out the fact that today charity is international wherein aid workers and religious workers reach out to remote places to be noble. The cynic would say that the well-off are reaching out to exorcise the demons within them. If we are less cynical then we would simply look at the good which is resulting from charity.
In some parts of the world, Charity is a method to launder money from black to white. Educational institutions and religious institutions play a role in this business.
Right wing Economists who have a belief that self interest governs most actions of man are intrigued by charity. They will take solace in the fact that charity has in fact fallen to half of what it was five decades back in real dollar terms. They might miss out the fact that today charity is international wherein aid workers and religious workers reach out to remote places to be noble. The cynic would say that the well-off are reaching out to exorcise the demons within them. If we are less cynical then we would simply look at the good which is resulting from charity.
No comments:
Post a Comment